<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank you to everyone who helped us get Mohamed Khater&#8217;s letter published in the Post-Standard.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dhafirtrial.net/2007/11/06/thank-you-to-everyone-who-helped-us-get-mohamed-khaters-letter-published-in-the-post-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dhafirtrial.net/2007/11/06/thank-you-to-everyone-who-helped-us-get-mohamed-khaters-letter-published-in-the-post-standard/</link>
	<description>Information about Dr. Rafil Dhafir</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:39:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://www.dhafirtrial.net/2007/11/06/thank-you-to-everyone-who-helped-us-get-mohamed-khaters-letter-published-in-the-post-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-78190</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dhafirtrial.net/2007/10/28/thank-you-to-everyone-who-helped-us-get-mohamed-khaters-letter-published-in-the-post-standard/#comment-78190</guid>
		<description>From Jeanie Shaterian, California:

You  have a real gift for presenting complicated legal matters in ways  that we all can understand. The Editor&#039;s Note defends the judge and  jury&#039;s portrayal of Dr. Dhafir as a common criminal out for personal  gain, and anyone who reads the Note would probably agree with its conclusion, based on the information it presents. Thanks for setting it straight for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Jeanie Shaterian, California:</p>
<p>You  have a real gift for presenting complicated legal matters in ways  that we all can understand. The Editor&#8217;s Note defends the judge and  jury&#8217;s portrayal of Dr. Dhafir as a common criminal out for personal  gain, and anyone who reads the Note would probably agree with its conclusion, based on the information it presents. Thanks for setting it straight for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

